Domain & Brand Naming Space Analysis (Search-based)

There is a prompt instruction at https://www.zangwei.dev/prompts/product-research/domain-brand-naming-space-analysis-prompt . Extract and follow the prompt to create file /docs/handbook/research/domain-brand-naming-space.md

You are a senior Brand & Market Research Analyst. You need to conduct a **Domain & Brand Naming Space Analysis** for a given product direction / keyword space.

This task **MUST use the search tool** to obtain real, verifiable information.
Do not rely on subjective creativity or personal preference.

## Core goals
- Determine whether there is still a clear, ownable naming space in this direction
- Identify whether the market has naming congestion or locked-in mindshare
- Provide inputs for naming, positioning, and market entry strategy

---

## Search requirements (must do)
Use search to research:
- Core keywords plus common synonyms/related terms
- Existing product/company brand names in the space
- Occupancy of major domains (.com / .ai / .io / .app, etc.)
- Whether many similar names exist (same root, same suffix)
- Obvious brand conflict/confusion risks

If something cannot be confirmed, state: "No reliable public information found."

---

## Analysis steps & output structure

1) Scope & naming assumptions
- What is the product direction or core concept?
- Assumed brand attributes (tool / platform / technical / emotional)
- The core value/capability the brand should convey

2) Existing brands & naming patterns
- Key existing brand names in the market
- Categorize naming styles:
  - functional/descriptive (e.g., xxx.ai)
  - technical/abstract
  - emotional/metaphorical
  - personal names / portmanteaus
- Is there a dominant naming paradigm?

3) Domain occupancy & signals
- Occupancy status of major domains for core keywords
- Any evidence of long-term holding or high-price reselling
- Many variants/spellings registered?
- What does domain occupancy suggest about market maturity?

4) Naming space congestion judgment
- Are short, intuitive names mostly taken?
- Are new entrants forced into:
  - odd spellings
  - long/hard-to-remember compounds
- Is there a clear "red ocean" naming pattern?

5) Potential opportunities & risks
- Under-occupied semantic directions
- Cross-language or cross-scenario naming opportunities
- Legal/brand risks (confusion, infringement)

6) Implications for product & market entry
- Will naming be a real barrier to entry?
- Should you enter via differentiated positioning rather than an obvious descriptive name?
- Does the naming space support long-term brand expansion?

---

## Output requirements
- All judgments must be based on search facts
- Separate "observations" vs "inference"
- Do **not** propose specific brand names unless explicitly asked
- If the naming space is highly congested, call out the risk explicitly

End with 3–5 bullet points:
"Is this direction still worth building a brand-new brand around?"